Friday, 5 May 2017

SPLC / SOROS Sponsor Gay Terrorist Attacks like what happened to the in Australia being bombed by two gay terrorists

Wealthy Anti-Christian hate group – Southern Poverty Law Center – targeting MassResistance chapters

Working to intimidate and silence parents and citizens

Also targeting hundreds of pro-family groups nationwide

Despicable tactics widely condemned across America

May 5, 2017

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) uses psychological methods to portray pro-family, Christian, and conservative groups as dangerous to society and labels hundreds of them as "hate groups."
The virulently anti-Christian Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), a well-funded left-wing extremist group based in Montgomery, Alabama, has begun targeting our MassResistance chapters, particularly our chapters in California, Texas, and Missouri. It has started pushing its demonization and disinformation to local liberal activists and media outlets.
It has become a common tactic of the Left to aggressively label groups that promote conservative and Judeo-Christian values as “hate groups” and “fringe” – rather than try to win in the court of public opinion. The goals are to demean religious belief and values and to shame and intimidate pro-family people into silence – and thus keep them out of the public forum.

Using imagery to demonize pro-family groups. This old photo of the KKK is displayed where one clicks to list the SPLC's "Extremist Files" -- which includes pro-family groups such as Alliance Defending Freedom, Act for America, American Family Association, and Liberty Counsel.
These tactics have accelerated since President Trump was elected. Rabid left-wing activists and their “fake news” allies in the mainstream media have stepped up their efforts against all conservatives using this approach. Virtually every major pro-family group in the U.S. has been targeted, along with Christian groups, Tea Party groups, and those critical of illegal immigration and Islamic terror. The SPLC has also similarly labeled various prominent individuals, including Dr. Ben Carson (which it was forced to rescind after a national outcry).
Whenever possible, the SPLC identifies bad people as Trump supporters.
Major pro-family groups labeled “hate groups” by the SPLC: ACT for America, Alliance Defending Freedom, American College of Pediatricians, American Family Association, Campus Ministry USA, Catholic Family & Human Rights Institute (C-Fam), Coral Ridge Ministries, Family Research Council, Family Watch International, Illinois Family Institute, Liberty Counsel, MassResistance, Mission America, National Organization for Marriage, Pacific Justice Institute, Pass the Salt Ministries, Ruth Institute, Traditional Values Coalition, World Congress of Families
Individuals labeled as “haters” and “extremists” by the SPLC include: David Barton, Tony Perkins, Tim Wildmon, Scott Lively, Charles Murray, Mat Staver, Cliff Kincaid, David Horowitz, Frank Gaffney, Brian Camenker, Brian Brown, Joseph Farah, Peter LaBarbera, Pamela Geller, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Brigitte Gabriel, Daniel Pipes, and Robert Spencer.

Here is part of a "warning" that the SPLC posted to its activists.
The SPLC freely admits that the “hate group” designation is not for anything that pro-family, conservative, or Christian groups actually do, but the fact that their beliefs are at odds with Leftist doctrine. For example, if a group believes that homosexuality causes diseases and a shorter lifespan on average, it is a hate group – despite overwhelming medical evidence supporting that position.

SPLC “hate list” linked to attempted murders

Not surprisingly, the SPLC’s aggressive hatred of Christian groups has led to at least one bloody scene of attempted murder. On Aug. 15, 2012, Floyd Lee Corkins walked into the lobby of Family Research Council, a Christian-based group in Washington DC, and began shooting. A guard was shot but managed to subdue him. Corkins later told police that he wanted to methodically kill as many people as possible because the organization was listed as a Southern Poverty Law Center “hate” group. He was convicted and sentenced to 25 years in prison. But the SPLC never apologized or even acknowledged any regret for this deadly incident.
In addition to the attempted murders, the violent melee at Middlebury College targeting Dr. Charles Murray, an American Enterprise Institute scholar, was instigated by the SPLC's "hate list", according to numerous participants in that sordid activity.

Not included: Genuine left-wing hate groups

Actual hate groups – such Black Lives Matter, which has advocated murdering police, and the Gay and Lesbian Task Force, which put on a “gay Jesus” event – are not included in any SPLC list.

The left-wing groups that organized and mobilized the bloody violence against conservatives at Berkeley this year are not considered "hateful" by the SPLC.
Since 2005 there have been numerous attacks on churches and gatherings of conservatives by organized LGBT activists. In 2008 homosexual groups in California staged a campaign of terror and violence against Christians who supported Prop 8. Yet none of those homosexual groups have been deemed a “hate” group by the SPLC -- though they clearly should be.
In 2009 a local LGBT group organized an effort to terrorize people attending a religious event at a downtown Boston church. But the SPLC does not consider this to be "hate."

Main purpose: Raising huge money from gullible liberals

But inflaming liberal activists against conservatives is actually a secondary purpose of the SPLC. Its primary purpose is to raise extraordinary amounts of money from gullible liberals using these scare tactics. Over the years, the SPLC has built a war chest of nearly $300 million, according to reports, and spends relatively little of it on any legitimate “non-profit” activity -- besides more fundraising.
The SPLC first became prominent in 1987 by suing a moribund and dying local KKK group. They then used that to raise millions from that via direct mail. And they’ve never looked back.
The lurid and emotional use of the “hate” theme – portrayed very professionally – throughout the SPLC’s website and literature has proven to be an enormous moneymaker for the organization.

Near-universal condemnation of SPLC

These sleazy tactics have earned the SPLC vast condemnation from across the political spectrum. The waves of criticism against them across the political spectrum does not deter them, however. (See list of articles below.)

Tactics taken from Nazi propaganda

The SPLC’s most popular dehumanizing tactic against Christian and conservative groups is reminiscent of how Joseph Goebbels, the Third Reich’s Minister of Propaganda during the 1930’s, worked to dehumanize Jews. Goebbels would produce movie clips showing groups of Jews, then interspersing them with rats and other vermin, to give the psychological message that they were all part of the same dirt polluting society.
The SPLC employs a similar strategy using series of “hate maps” for each state, placing Christian and conservative groups interspersed with neo-Nazi and KKK groups alongside them. They also use a lot of Nazi and KKK imagery on their website. It also lists pro-family organizations and individual leaders among neo-Nazi and Aryan-nation groups and leaders. The purpose is to send the psychological message that they are all equally vile.

The SPLC's "hate" map intersperses new-Nazi and KKK groups with pro-family groups, Christian groups, and other conservative organizations.
(Actually, it appears that almost none of the neo-Nazi or KKK groups posted actually exist. Some are believed to be fictional, or even “created” by the SPLC for targeted fundraising. For example, we have never been able to find any of the ones listed in their New England maps or lists. The few that the SPLC can actually vouch for around the country appear to be mostly just one or two people in a basement.)

“Teaching Tolerance” as entrĂ©e to schools and police

The SPLC aggressively works to push its message of hate against conservative and Christian values into schools, police, and other government agencies such as the FBI.
A major tool for that is its “Teaching Tolerance” magazine, a truly Orwellian publication which purports -- in an often subtle but powerfully well-crafted style -- that true “tolerance” demands a rejection of traditional religious and cultural values, and acceptance of the leftist mantra. Thousands of copies of “Teaching Tolerance” are sent to schools across America, which are then implemented by leftist teachers.
This issue of "Teaching Tolerance'" distributed to schools across the country, is for teaching children: "Sex? Sexual orientation? Gender identity? Gender expression? Learn the language and the facts."
The SPLC’s twisted “tolerance” agenda has also found its way into police departments across America – and even the FBI. This successfully fueled the institutional suspicion and even loathing of conservative, Christian, and Tea Party groups by law enforcement agencies in recent years, while liberal and LGBT groups – even Black Lives Matter or left-wing terror groups in Berkeley -- are accepted and even welcomed.

The SPLC also lists so-called "Active Anti-Government Groups" on their website. The list includes Tea Parties, the Eagle Forum, the Constitution Party, Oath Keepers, and the news site WorldNetDaily.
Notably, in 2014, the FBI cut its ties with the SPLC after public outcry over its phony “research,” and when it became obvious that the SPLC’s claims about the rise of “hate” groups in America were vastly inconsistent with the FBI’s own findings. However, at some point after that the Obama Justice Department apparently forced the FBI to bring the SPLC back in, and so far the Trump Administration has not stepped in to fix that.

Another type of offensive SPLC imagery is connecting people carrying the American Flag with skinheads and Neo-Nazis.

Funding huge lawsuits against Judeo-Christian groups

Over the last few years, the SPLC has used its enormous bankroll to fund lawsuits against Christian and Jewish groups and individuals that are effective or whom the SPLC wants to make a strategic “example” of. For example, last year, the SPLC used the courts to shut down the counseling service JONAH, a Jewish group helping people who wanted to leave the homosexual lifestyle. SPLC has recently announced a lawsuit against Mat Staver and Liberty Counsel, a Christian-based legal service.
Of course, the SPLC also sues purported neo-Nazi and similar groups (usually relatively small and impotent), and then uses those “wins” for huge fundraising.

Lies and disinformation about pro-family leaders

In addition to their odious “hate group” campaign, the SPLC writes accompanying articles about pro-family leaders that contain purposeful lies and misrepresentations. This is frequently repeated as “fact” by liberal websites and Wikipedia authors, and also by the mainstream media. Here is the SPLC’s write-up of Brian Camenker of MassResistance.
In fact, there is now a well-funded industry of angry leftist groups – such as Right Wing Watch, People for the American Way, Media Matters, Human Rights Campaign, Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAAD) – that faithfully regurgitate the accusations, misinformation, and outright hate from the SPLC and distribute it to eager liberal activists.

Do not let these disgusting tactics silence you!

The Left, including those in the mainstream media, knows that it can never win the war of public opinion using facts and reason. That’s why they’re obsessed with the need to shame, intimidate, and harass conservatives and people of faith who dare to speak out. It is a classic bullying tactic.
But we're not letting it stop us.
The only way to ultimately avoid this treatment is to agree with them on everything. Even a relatively small divergence will attract their wrath. So don’t even try to placate them.
Don’t fall for it. Never let them intimidate you. If you stand up to this boldly and aggressively, they will begin to back down. They always do. Deep down they’re basically cowards. When we keep fighting with the truth, the truth eventually wins.

What others across America are saying about the SPLC...

Here are some articles about the SPLC and its activities:
SEE REPORT on Southern Poverty Law Center's "hate" scam on America:  Scoial Contract magazine recently devoted an entire issue to exposing the SPLC. Read their Spring 2010 issue HERE.
This will really open up your eyes!
Immigration and the SPLC – Anatamy of a smear
Center for Immigration Studies
Is the Southern Poverty Law Center “Extremist?”
L-I   Legal Insurrection 2/11/2015
Secondhand Hate
The Weekly Standard

LUKE: WOW GAYS ARE STILL FIGHTING TO MAKE ANIMAL ON HOMO SEX LEGAL LIKE THEY DID REPEALING BESTIALITY FROM THE US MILITARY CODE OF JUSTICE SUCCESSFULLY. That explains why NSW Police dirty dyke cop Trisha Leach stole John Sunol's tablet and updated his google blogger profile to say I love donkey dick after deleting all of his email - included threats from the boylover Garry Burns. Gays dig sex with animals. Maybe it's time to post those pictures of the gay cop that arrested me Tui Ormsby with her very well endowered German Shepard and Lesbian Girlfriend?

Yes rather than removing one word from the act - the gay lobby fought hard previously to remove this whole clause from the military code of justice making it legal for a US soldier to mount a goat in Afghanistan.

According to this link:, the National Defense Authorization Act includes the removal of Article 125 from the UCMJ. As of December.1.2011, Senate approved the NDAA (93-7 votes). As long as President Obama does not veto the act, LGB service members will be free to their own will without NJP/Discharge worries.


10. Punitive Articles

(a) Any person subject to this chapter who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy. Penetration , however slight, is sufficient to complete the offense.
(b) Any person found guilty of sodomy shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

The gay cop that arrested me Christopher Kent Bowersox also got caught with animal sex porn:

Former Army Col. Bob Maginnis said some military lawyers have indicated that bestiality may be prosecutable under another section of the military code of justice – the “catch-all” Article 134 for offenses against “good military order and discipline.”
But don't count on that, he said.
“If we have a soldier who engages in sodomy with an animal – whether a government animal or a non-government animal – is it, in fact, a chargeable offense under the Uniform Code? I think that’s in question,” Maginnis told
“When the reader stops laughing, the reader needs to ask the question whether or not this is in the best interests of the government, in the best interests of the military and the best interests of the country? I think not.”
He added: “Soldiers, unfortunately, like it or not, have engaged in this type of behavior in the past. Will they in the future, if they remove this statute? I don’t know.”

How the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) publishes disinformation articles about pro-family leaders

Here's what they've written about Brian Camenker of MassResistance

Attempts to misinform and demonize.

May 5, 2017
The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) libels pro-family, conservative, and Judeo-Christian organization around the country as “hate groups.” The SPLC also posts recklessly untrue, inaccurate, and dishonest articles about individual pro-family leaders. Unfortunately, these articles are often referenced as “fact” by leftwing websites, Wikipedia authors, and the mainstream media.
For example, here are excerpts from the SPLC’s article that includes Brian Camenker of MassResistance.
Here's what the SPLC writes about Camenker -- and the truth below.
At a 2006 religious right gathering in Washington, D.C., Camenker insisted that gays were trying to get legislation passed to allow sex with animals. "One bill in Massachusetts takes away all the penalties for bestiality," he claimed. "This is where this [homosexual] agenda is going." A little later, he added, "They [gays and lesbians] are pushing perversion on our kids."
SPLC writes this as if Camenker was falsely claiming that the LGBT lobby was trying to repeal the bestiality statute (Ch. 272, sec. 34). But in fact, the LGBT lobby DID quietly file bills to repeal it – not only in 2006 but several times since then, including a bill filed in the recent 2015-2016 session. It was bizarre. Luckily, none of them have ever gotten out of committee.
The basic point is that the Left (and particularly the LGBT movement) is trying to overturn all laws concerned with sex that they consider “archaic”.
In 2006-2007, Mass-Resistance pushed for an amendment of the 1996 statute that would have required that parents be notified of any discussion of gay or lesbian issues in the schools. The group proposed language that lumped sexual orientation (which includes heterosexuality, homosexuality and bisexuality) in with criminal behaviors like bestiality and polygamy.
This is not accurate and purposely misleading. The bill (S321) didn’t reference “discussion” of anything. It said that if schools were “presenting, implementing, or maintaining a school program” that included a list of subjects (all connected to sexuality), then parents are given the option to “opt in” to that program – not forced to “opt out” if they didn't want their child included. It’s completely reasonable.
During legislative testimony supporting the amendment, Camenker falsely claimed that no homosexuals died in the Holocaust and that the pink triangle the Nazis forced imprisoned gays to wear actually signified Catholic priests.
This is a complete lie. Camenker has never made any claim that “no homosexuals died in the Holocaust.” That would be absurd.
Regarding the pink triangles, Camenker said that SOME of the people forced to wear them were actually Catholic priests who were not “gay” but instead had been falsely accused of it by the Nazis, as an excuse to imprison them. This information came directly from Stephan Ross, a survivor of Auschwitz and several other concentration camps. Ross was the speaker at the 2005 MassResistance Banquet and was quite explicit about many issues regarding the camps.
Camenker, who has long focused on the purported “homosexual agenda” in the schools and frequently claimed gays are dangerous to kids, has repeatedly cited discredited claims from organizations like the National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality that link homosexuality and pedophilia.
More SPLC propaganda. Research from the National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH) is medically accurate and has not been “discredited” by any unbiased medical organization.
In 2008, Camenker made another accusation for which there was no supporting evidence at all — the claim that the state of Massachusetts had had to spend more money every year since same-sex marriage became legal in that state. That, he said, was because of “skyrocketing homosexual domestic violence” and because of the “extreme dysfunctional nature of homosexual relationships.”
This is another complete lie. Any cursory study of the Massachusetts State Budget during those years shows that expenditures for LGBT-related issues had in fact gone up each year. Moreover, it was the LGBT groups themselves that were claiming that homosexual domestic violence need more and more state money – and were lobbying hard for it in the Legislature.
This year, MassResistance called Boston Gay Pride events a “depraved” display that featured “a great deal of obviously disturbed, dysfunctional, and extremely self-centered people whose aim was to push their agenda.”
Well, the SPLC got this one right!


200k people watch Luke McKee expose gay pedo judge Alexander John Wakefield, kingpin of the OZ Historical Child sex Arbitration Business ordering children to enjoy their child sex and never complain about it publicly in case law.

Gay Pedo Judge Wakefied who says he specializes in profiting from gay child rape and representing pedophiles on his corporate law-firm blog ruled Robert Oscar Lopez a hate criminal for not enjoying his gay parenting facilitated child rape and speaking out about it here.
Luke Mckee is a hate criminal for linking to a child sex victim who didn't like it, as is John Christopher Sunol for linking to Luke McKee who linked to a victim of child sex. How dare all those people support victims of gay child sex - they must be prosecuted for not loving it and not being a boylover just like the gay judge. This is actually going on in case law!

When this blog expose this last November, Garry Burns send the Police after John Sunol for what Luke McKee published and did all by himself as a public act here:

Garry is a nutjob, everyone knows it.

The Newcastle GLLO Gay child sexxer protector pedophile police quickly reacted to support the historical child sex hush money legal industry and "John" "<-fake name I use in court" Wakefield last November, and John Sunol suffered a stroke from the NSW gay pedophile police persecution.

Protesting this corruption we added links pictures to Garry Burns penis pictures he sends children, and his emails requesting bare back sex with children he hasn't met whilst he has the AIDS virus to the comments on the 1977 ADB Act blog post above. 

Newcastle Police especially detective inspector Peter Mahon believes gay men have the basic human rights to inject AIDS HIV+ semen into a child arse they don't even know especially when it's Catherine Burn's best mate Garry Burns doing it. That's the latest prosecution of John Sunol, all this being quarterbacked by NSW's former Counter Terrorism Chief Catherine Judith Burns. Here's her with a Muslim suicide bomber supporter. Garry is an extension of the NSW criminal gay police who do cyber-crimes getting 10 years jail to protect him as proven here. His views are in line with ABC Television who believes gay men have the basic human right to have sex with SBS dateline calls a "minor" in Russia as exposed here:

Detective Peter Mahon isn't the sharpest tool in the shed, for doing the Great Boylover Garry Burns's bidding and going after my 72 year old university father, on behest of a pedophile suspect who sends his penis picture to children. Here's the link to it:

Julian Assange muses is it timed for an armed resolution against the pedophile loving police? May 11 there will be public protests in Newcastle against Gay Pedo Lover Peter Mahon and co!

NSW Police should be doing their job to arrest Garry Burns mate Peter Tatchell who says sex with 9 year old boys bring joy like the Talmud says when he's not leading the Sydney Gay an Lesbian Mardi Gras (2011) or better yet arrest the Australian youtubers who say pedosexuals should have the right to rape children rather than doing their bidding as they are so clearly doing.

Grand Mufti Ibrahim Abu Mohammed linked to banned sheik who approved suicide bombing

AUSTRALIA’S controversial Muslim leader has been linked to a Middle Eastern sheik who approved suicide bombing and has been banned from the US, Britain and France.
Grand Mufti Ibrahim Abu Mohammed, is said to publicly support exiled Egyptian sheik Yusuf al-Qaradawi who has urged the world’s Muslims to fight in Syria, the Australian reports today.
The Sydney-based, Egyptian-born Grand Mufti visited Qaradawi at his base in the Arab Gulf state of Qatar in April 2013.

Controversial... The Grand Mufti with NSW Assistant Police Commissioner Catherine Burn at last night’s Lindt siege ceremony. Picture: Jonathan Ng
Meeting... Exlied Egyptian sheik Yusuf al-Qaradawi

They are reported to have discussed “the role of ­Islamic communities in Australia”, according to Qatari media, which published a photograph of their meeting in the capital, Doha.
Dr Mohammed has been at the centre of a torrent of criticism in Australia, more recently over the Paris terror attacks when he suggested racism and Islamophobia were partly to blame for the deadly attacks.
Last month, he was also at the centre of another storm with the release of details of a book he wrote saying non-Muslims wanted their women to walk around “exposed as a piece of sweet pastry ... ­devoured by the eyes of men”.
It was also revealed the Mufti had rubbed shoulders with Lindt siege terrorist Man Monis during a visit to the Villawood detention centre, along with the leader of radical ­Islamic group Hizb ut-Tahrir.

Bloody... Qaradawi has urged the world’s Muslims to fight in Syria

The Australian reported today Dr Mohammed’s name and his Australian National Imams Council are also listed on a petition calling on Interpol to remove Qaradawi from its wanted list.
He is sought by Egyptian authorities on charges including incitement to murder and aiding a prison escape.
The petition says the charges are politically motivated. The 89-year-old Qaradawi is considered the spiritual head of Egypt’s banned Muslim Brotherhood and is a prominent opponent of the Egyptian government.

Terror...The Grand Mufti was under fire for his comments after the Paris atrocity.

He sanctioned suicide attacks on Israeli civilians as “heroic martyrdom operations”, described the Holocaust as “divine punishment” of Jews and has appeared to justify the killing of apostates. He was denounced as a “theologian of terror” in a statement against the use of religion to incite violence signed by 2500 Muslim intellectuals from 23 countries in 2004.
Asked for confirmation that the Grand Mufti signed the petition or consented to it, a spokeswoman declined to comment yesterday.

Daily Telegraph: Everyone thinks the gay judges at @NCATNSW must be kiddy fiddlers. THE COURT OF GAY CHILD SEX PEDOSEXUAL LOVE MUST END. OZZIES CALL FOR GAY JUDGE MASS FIRING!

Rapists, paedophiles, killers, wife beaters and baby bashers cleared to work with children

Our analysis of NCAT ­appeals finalised over the past 12 months shows a small but significant number of individuals being granted clearances against the express wishes of the Children’s Guardian, which denied the clearance and then asked the Tribunal not to grant it on appeal.
These include at least 15 cases ranging from instances of child abuse, violent sexual assaults and, in one case, the murder of a police officer.
Family and Community Services Minister Brad Hazzard said the cases identified were both “deeply concerning” and may have failed the “commonsense test”.
Mr Hazzard said he would ask the state’s Attorney General Gabrielle Upton to review the decisions.
“Logically, there can’t be too may circumstances where allowing a murderer to work with children could be considered a sensible option,” Mr Hazzard said, referring to the case of a woman recently awarded a WWCC, despite being on parole until August 30, 2017 for a bashing murder.
The tribunal heard the woman, whose identity is suppressed, was a reformed drug addict who had changed her life while serving a 12-year jail sentence.
Ms Upton said the 15 cases highlighted were concerning and that she had requested a “full report into the circumstances” of each matter.
Children are in peril as people with criminals records have been allowed access to work with them.
Only a small number of cases are heard at the tribunal, according to the Children’s Guardian’s most recent annual report.
During the 2013-2014 period there were 420,499 ­applications for a WWCC, of which 221 cases were barred or queried.
The report stated that 83 cases went for appeal and of the 44 cases heard during the reporting period, 16 clearances were granted.
In many cases, the people applying for a WWCC already work or come into contact with children.
Under new WWCC laws introduced in 2013, anyone volunteering or working in a paid capacity with children, including foster carers, must obtain a WWCC.
The ­influx of applications — more than 700,000 — has seen some people facing sudden uncertainty with their careers or personal lives as they become flagged for historic offences.
One case identified is a 72-year-old man who is a priest’s assistant in his local Catholic Church and vice-president of his swimming club.
He came to the guardian’s attention when he recently applied for a new WWCC after more than a decade with the club.
He has been working with the club and other organisations for more than a decade but was only ­recently flagged when applying for a new WWCC.
In 1963 he was convicted of fondling two 13-year-old boys in a toilet ­cubicle, but the tribunal said it was comfortable he was no more a risk to children than any other male his age.
While each appeal judgment is a public document, the names of people seeking a WWCC are anonymised to protect the identities of their victims and children involved.
The Sunday Telegraph is campaigning to protect children.
The tribunal ruled that in another case a man convicted of having sex with and indecently assaulting a 13-year-old girl in 1989 should be granted a WWCC because the incident was “opportunistic” and did not involve any force.
In many of the appeal cases, the tribunal found the applicants were no longer an ­“appreciable risk” to children because, in some cases, decades had passed since their ­offences.
Other factors taken into account were whether they remained on the police radar for other convictions, or whether they continued to use drugs or alcohol, both seen as triggers for offences.
One case involved a man who physically assaulted a 17-year-old victim, then, a year later, dangled his partner’s baby by one leg (he claimed the baby was laughing).
Years later he was convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to five years in prison.
The tribunal awarded him a WWCC after finding he had sufficiently rehabilitated himself and ceased using ­alcohol.
This was despite him suffering an ­alcoholic relapse in 2006 and assaulting a police officer.
Asked to comment, the tribunal said there were avenues of appeal available to people who believed the body had “erred in its decision”.
Experts and the NSW ­Opposition have backed The Sunday Telegraph’sconcerns.
Loopholes we have identified include:
 A person who ­applies online for a WWCC can immediately start working, a process that is beneficial for most people without criminal records but is open to exploitation
 The criminal history screening process does not cover any offences committed overseas
 Apprehended Violence Orders (AVOs) involving a child are not automatically assessed by the Children’s Guardian because the files are not held by a central police ­database.


The Sunday Telegraph demands:
 Working With Children checks must include foreign criminal records and apprehended violence orders
 Workers must get a new clearance if they change jobs
 Government review of NCAT rulings and Children Protection (Working With Children) Act 2012

Would you trust these people with your kids?

These 15 applicants were banned from working with children by the NSW Children’s Guardian, but subsequently cleared by the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal in just one year, 2014-15
 Woman on parole for a 2005 bashing murder with prior drug and assault convictions who had children removed from her care. NCAT SAID: She is unlikely to reuse drugs, has strong family ties and appears rehabilitated.
 Man with history of domestic violence, convicted of incest in 1981. Claims he believed the victim was 17 and not technically his daughter. NCAT SAID: He’s been of good behaviour since the incident and has overcome his abuse of alcohol.
 A Jehovah’s Witness convicted of publicly masturbating, while drunk, in front of four teenagers in 2005. NCAT SAID: He has no other criminal convictions, strong family ties, a religious commitment and poses no “appreciable risk” to children.
 Man convicted of assaulting a 17-year-old in 1988 and dangling a baby by one leg in 1989. Jailed for manslaughter in 2003. NCAT SAID: No convictions since 2006 when he had an alcoholic relapse and assaulted a police officer. Conduct otherwise good since then.
People with criminal records were given Working with Children Checks.
 Truckie who raped a 22-year-old woman in 1989 with prior convictions for assaulting police and resisting arrest. NCAT SAID: His conduct was “reprehensible” but the victim was not a child, he expressed remorse and he’s unlikely to reoffend.
 A man who had sex with a 13-year-old girl in 1982 when he was 25. Said he thought she was 15 at the time. The victim was a friend of his partner’s son. NCAT SAID: It remains his only criminal conviction and he needs the WWCC so his wife can continue running a childcare service from their home.
 72-year-old swimming coach and Catholic priest’s assistant who fondled two 13-year-old boys in a public toilet in 1963. Now Vice President of his swimming club. NCAT SAID: No subsequent convictions; risk is no higher than other men his age.
 A man with mild retardation convicted of indecency with a 9-year-old girl with a mental disability in 1987, when he was 19. NCAT SAID: He needs a WWCC to play on his church soccer team. The 9-year-old victim told police she consented. He has committed no further offences since then.
 Man convicted of indecent assault and sexual intercourse with a 13 year old girl in 1989, when he was 27. NCAT SAID: The offence was “opportunistic” and “did not involve force”. No later convictions.
 Man convicted of murdering a Queensland police officer in 1968, when he was 25. Also assaulted police. NCAT SAID: No longer drinks. Hasn’t come to police attention in 47 years and leads “an exemplary life”.
 Foster carer who raped a 16-year-old girl in 1978 who has convictions for assaulting his wife, dishonesty and malicious wounding. NCAT SAID: No subsequent sexual assaults, has given up drinking, has cared for 13 grandchildren.
 Man who sexually assaulted 17-year-old girl in 1996, when he was 22. Also assaulted a 14-year-old girl. NCAT SAID: No other serious offences. Unable to prove he has stopped drinking, but has not come to police attention since 1997.
 Former bikie who raped a 19-year-old woman in 1978. He later became a Christian and now works for a homeless charity. NCAT SAID: Experts say he is unlikely to reoffend unless he loses employment and returns to drugs and alcohol.
 Male medical worker who indecently assaulted an 18-year-old man during an examination in 2012. NCAT SAID: Victim was not a child. Offender has no prior record and does not pose a risk to children.
 Family day care worker convicted of assaulting her 14-year-old son in 2013. Also history of family violence, alcohol and attempted suicide. NCAT SAID: No evidence she posed a risk to other children — although Tribunal not convinced she is able to control her alcohol intake.